Global Warming – Life is a Carbon Sink

The following chart displays the global carbon dioxide gas levels from about 500 million years ago to about 2.5 million years ago. This time period extends from the Cambrian up through the Neogene Geologic Periods. I started with the Cambrian because CO2 levels prior to this period appear to have been fairly constant. The Cambrian was also when the first organisms with skeletons and shells appeared. Life was still pretty much limited to the seas. CO2 consuming land plants would not appear until the next Period, the Ordovician some millions of years later.

Of course, plants in the sea also consume CO2, however they are utilizing this gas while it is dissolved in the sea water. Dissolved CO2 doesn’t have the “Greenhouse Gas” effect that CO2 in the atmosphere does. So, for purposes of simplicity I have limited the scope of our investigation here, not to obfuscate, but to make the data a bit more manageable. I have also cut the chart off at the Neogene Period at a point in time 2.5 million years before the present. It’s pretty safe to say that hominids were not making fire at this time so we are looking at an entirely “non-human” environment.

graph showing the tremendous drop in co2 levels since the cambrian

The “Gold Stars” represent today’s values, the result of almost 250 years of industrial activity. Remember the line graph itself represents a time period when there was no human activity whatsoever. The “Y” axis represents the levels of CO2 as “Parts Per Million.” The unlabeled “X” axis represents the passage of time during the period under discussion – about 500 million years. Perhaps the biggest thing that stands out to me is the fact that throughout this long pre-human period of time, CO2 levels were always higher than they are today; usually MUCH higher.

Another point of interest is how that with the advent of atmospheric carbon dioxide absorbing land plants, the levels of CO2 dropped precipitously. This drop appears to have bottomed out at the time of the Permian Mass Extinction Event when there is evidence of a great deal of catastrophic volcanic activity. Volcanoes erupt massive amounts of CO2 and other Green House Gasses. Approximately 90% of all extant species were wiped out at this time. As the planet smoldered and then slowly recovered, CO2 levels began to climb. There is no evidence of any industrial activity whatsoever at this time.

The next big drop occurred in the aftermath of the “K-T Extinction Event” which wiped out the saurian mega-fauna (dinosaurs). There is convincing evidence that this event was kicked off by the catastrophic impact of a large meteor. There were simultaneous volcanic eruptions on a massive scale – those which formed the Deccan Traps, for example. This would have involved the release of huge amounts of CO2, however this was also the time of the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau.

The Tibetan Plateau along with the Himalayan Mountains exposed fresh rocks to the atmosphere. These rocks (like all rocks to some degree) absorb CO2. There were a number of other causes, however the facts are clear: Global CO2 levels plummeted during this time to the lowest levels in the long history of the earth. This is when the Ice Ages began. What causes CO2 levels to drop? To find the answer, you really don’t have to go any further than your local gas pump.

The petroleum that we burn today is the byproduct of organisms living millions of years ago. Remember that huge drop in CO2 when land plants appeared? Those plants didn’t recycle their carbon very effectively. Instead, their carbon ended up being locked up in the rocks and is recovered today as coal, natural gas and petroleum. Animal organisms like corals, diatoms and mollusks bury carbon in limestone and chalk when their shells and other calcium carbonate body parts drop off into the sea. The accumulated loss of this carbon to our biosphere led to the relatively recent Ice Ages. During an Ice Age, fresh water is locked up in continental glaciers which are often as much as a mile thick. And, since colder air is generally drier air, rainfall across the globe diminished and deserts expanded.

white cliffs of dover are composed of calcium carbonate - buried and lithified carbon.

The famous White Cliffs of Dover are composed of the calcium carbonate remains of trillions upon trillions of sea creatures. Buried and lithified (turned to stone) carbon which is now exposed to erosion. Only by being subducted beneath another continental plate and then expelled by a strato-volcano can this carbon be recycled and reincorporated into living things efficiently. Dissolved calcium carbonate may be taken up slowly. This means of recycling carbon would require eons.

At the time period when our chart ends, Greenland was covered by a lush forest. Large herds of animals no doubt called Greenland home as well. Greenland, by the way, is the largest island on the planet and it occupied pretty much the same latitudes as it does today. It is almost a “subcontinent” in size. Yet now, we see it is barren and desolate. Literally, a “desert.” There are some people today who are wringing their hands over the melting of the Greenland glaciers. But, who can say that it is a “good thing” that Greenland is colder today than when it supported so much life in the past. Wasn’t it really a “bad thing” when Greenland froze over? Much of the same things can be said about Antarctica. There were many contributing factors to these events, however, “colder temperatures” do seem to be a major cause of barren ice sheets.

The one common theme in much of the Global Warming discussion one hears is the vilification of all things “anthropogenic” – things that are caused by “man.” Human beings are seen as gluttonous creatures filled with avarice. Everything a human being does is immediately labeled “artificial” and negatively compared to “non-human” related events which are extolled as being “natural.” Yet human beings are part of this planet. We arose from the life on this planet. We are a part of the web of life which envelopes everything. Human beings are “natural.” Human activity is as “natural” as the migration of swans or the dance of a honey bee.

With that in mind, and also remembering how that life on this planet has served as a carbon sink – locking the most vital element needed for continued life irretrievably into rocks - who’s to say that at least one purpose for man isn’t the recovery of this lost carbon? Now, we have certainly demonstrated a capacity for fouling our own nest, many creatures have a similar capacity. That being said, we also have seen and learned a great deal about environmentally friendly ways of recovering carbon. The net effect of this activity, while raising human civilization to higher levels and alleviating a great deal of suffering in the world, has been to recycle the element of life: carbon; and to return it to the biosphere where it can be reincorporated into living things.

 

 

 

“Spotty Youth” – Then and Now

George Harrison 1967

George and Patti Harrison at Haight-Ashbury, 1967

I’ve just watched Part One of Martin Scorsese’s HBO documentary on the life of Beatle George Harrison. Part One takes us up through the time period of the “White Album” (1968) and gives us insight into some of George’s motivation in pursuing Eastern philosophy. Yes, you were right. “Drugs” did play at least a small role. But, it turns out; George Harrison quit the drug scene rather early on, fearful of the long term effects. If he had only been as fearful of the long term effect of exposure to tobacco the world might be a better place for his continued presence.

One particular part of the story had some real resonance for me today concerning recent events in the news. There was film of Harrison’s visit to Haight-Ashbury in San Francisco in 1967. This was at the height of the “Psychedelic Era.” In an interview recorded much later, George is sort of narrating the film of his visit. He talks of how he had hoped to see some sort of creative paradise filled with shops and artisans busily creating beautiful and imaginative arts and crafts. Instead, he found a disarray of young people, most of whom were stoned to their gills, wandering about aimlessly.

In describing his disappointment with the “Hippie Movement” he found in San Francisco, Harrison described the people he saw as “Spotty Youth.”

This brings us to today and the current “Movement” to “Occupy Wall Street” and other places of power… yet ironically, not the prime seat of power, Washington D.C. because that would be “politically incorrect.” I’ve been watching news reports of the “Wall Street” protests. Much of the main-stream media has been cheerleading for these folks. Yet,  just who are these people?

New York 'Day of Rage'

"New York Day of Rage" from zombietime.com

The primary faction behind organizing (sort of “organizing”) this “Occupation” was the Canadian group billed as “Ad Busters.” Yes. That’s right. Canadian. Remember that come time for the NHL hockey playoffs. The hacker group known as “Anonymous” has also had their rather small forces in attendance. They’re the ones wearing those faux Guy Fawkes masks that were passé 20 minutes after the movie was over.

We also see the usual gang of “useful idiots” (in Stalin’s words) who are waiting for their chance to break some windows and their counter-parts, the aging hippies who have yet to exhaust the trust funds they inherited from their grandparents back in the Haight-Ashbury days. And, the “Truthers” who “just know man! They just know!”

Add to this, the influence of the “Center for American Progress” (Van Jones’ new gig after getting caught using the Federal Treasury as a Piggy-Bank to reward Obama 2008 donors) and their offshoot, “Campus Progress” and I think it’s pretty easy to see why these protesters were never headed to Washington and the real source of their alleged ire. They are simply tools being used by the DNC and the political Left. At this point, we must mention the fact that this “growing” protest movement has failed to attract even 5% of their “expected” numbers. Bill O’Reilly has pointed out that “The Black Eyed Peas” attracted a crowd of 30,000 at Central Park just a few days before, easily outnumbering the rather scanty crowd on Wall Street.

And finally, that’s where the George Harrison connection comes in. George had seen “spotty youth” wandering about in his time, without any clear direction and without even appearing to give much thought to their actions. In the Sixties they had LSD to numb their minds from the terrible ennui that defined their existence. The protesters near Wall Street though, draw from a miserable apothecary of failed ideas and broken promises. They have no balm for their tortured minds and must live day-to-day with the searing realization that the free wireless LAN in Lower Manhattan simply will not allow all of them to watch themselves on YouTube at once.

These are today’s “spotty youth.” They are well fed, lightly taxed and without a care in the world. And so, they must invent cares. Heavy and important cares. They also must import their anger from Canada, where, as luck would have it, so many American manufacturing jobs have fled due to the oppression of the union thugs who are about to join the aforementioned spotty youth. There really is no wisdom to be found here and certainly no answers to today’s pressing problems.

The Bible’s Sources Revealed

Book CoverRichard Elliott Friedman offers a very sensible and even-handed approach to a very old and complex question. Sages have been wrestling with the issue of the Bible’s own testimony of itself versus the accumulated traditions and myths about the Bible for centuries. My own confidence in the Bible’s inspiration has been greatly enhanced by studies such as the one offered here by Professor Friedman. I know that many other believers will balk at tackling this issue with anything even approaching the sincerity and honesty that Friedman displays and I find this to be a tragic loss for the church and synagogue.

To fully appreciate the “discoveries” of the modern Documentary Hypothesis we must be willing to separate the things that the Bible actually says about itself from the things that religion has said about it. (I put the word “discoveries” in quotes because these are actually things that the Bible has been saying all along). Friedman’s approach does this while showing great respect for the texts and for those who hold other opinions as well. And make no mistake about it, the issues discussed here focus entirely upon what the Bible says about itself along with expert analysis of the various stages of the Hebrew language. This is “Higher Criticism” of the highest order.

The Bible with Sources Revealed by Richard Elliott Friedman makes an important contribution to the library of any serious Bible student. This is a very easy to use book. The introductory remarks and notes alone make this a great buy. But, having the Pentateuch clearly divided into its various sources along with references to further contributions by these sources to other books of the Bible makes this work indispensable.

For those unfamiliar with the writings of Professor Friedman, his analysis of the Pentateuch follows the “JEDP” format that was popularized by such scholars as Graf and Wellhausen in the early 19th Century. An important contribution by Friedman and other more contemporary scholars such as Harvard’s Frank Moore Cross, Jr., has been to disprove the assertions of Wellhausen’s modern disciples; a movement known as “Biblical Minimalism” which denies the existence of the Israelite religion prior to the Second Temple era and even questions the existence of the ancient Kingdom of Israel & Judah ruled by the House of David. Another book by Professor Friedman, “Who Wrote the Bible?” explores the evidence of the antiquity of the Israelite culture and demonstrates from clues within the text of the Bible itself, how portions of Scripture such as the Priestly Code clearly predate the Exile and Second Temple periods.

This issue becomes important for a number of reasons. If the “Biblical Minimalists” are correct, then the modern nation of Israel’s claims to holding the land of Israel in antiquity is shaken. Moreover, if the Old Testament was truly written in toto, only around 516 BC; then its claims of of the nation and religion of Israel having actually been established almost 700 years prior must be regarded not only as fiction, but a fraud.

Fortunately for our attempts to treat the Biblical texts in a scholarly manner, as opposed to an unquestioning sycophantic Fundamentalism, this old Book does tell us of its own history. As many a Bible educator has said before, “The Text has a history and the Text itself tells us of that history…” Too many of my fellow believers have treated the Documentary Hypothesis and other scholarly tools of inquiry as taboo because “some guy” who died over 100 years ago either lost faith over the issue or rejected the tools out of fear. The knee jerk reaction of the Fundamentalists of the last century and a half displayed a glaring lack of discernment and very little commitment to learning. Instead of waiting before deciding on the question of the Documentary Hypothesis, they took Wellhausen’s bait and slammed their Bibles shut.

Time and a lot of hard work, however, has vindicated the very plain statements that the Bible makes about itself. Writing in the Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR), Yosef Garfinkel recently was able to declare the “… Death of Biblical Minimalism” (requires subscription for the full length article). He did so, not because of the arguments of the Fundamentalist; but because of the labors of fellow scholars along with the spade of the archaeologist had proven that the “Minimalist” approach to the Bible had been misguided. Meanwhile, Fundamentalism offered not one word to help tip the scales in the debate.

There are many important debates and discussions going on concerning matters of faith and in particular, faith in the Bible. Fundamentalism takes us out of the discussion. Professor Friedman’s scholarship, on the other hand, and his books such as “The Bible With Sources Revealed” gives us tools with which we can win those debates.

Howard Goss – A Pentecostal Life

Cover of Howard Goss - A Pentecostal LifeJohnston gives us a rather excellent introduction to the life of one of the “Great Pentecostal Pioneers.” There are some important gaps, however, that may give some of the author’s critics room to see an agenda at work here. Goss was one of the primary organizers of both the Assemblies of God and the Pentecostal Church, Inc. (“PCI” – a predecessor to the United Pentecostal Church, Inc. – later “International”). After being driven from the Assemblies of God over the “New Issue” (Jesus name baptism and the Oneness of God), Goss sought to organize the Oneness ministers into an effective force for evangelism and world missions. The fruit of his efforts, the P.C.I. being the prime result, was incredibly successful given the numbers of men involved. In fact, they were so successful that other Oneness groups eyed the organization covetously.

It is here that Johnston’s pen seems to lose ink. Though he does cover Goss’ exit from leadership within the new UPCI, Johnston is silent about Goss’ later work and the manner in which his doctrine was received. Thomas Fudge’s book, Christianity without the Cross: A History of Salvation in Oneness Pentecostalism, follows this aspect of Howard A. Goss’ career with greater detail. For example, Professor Fudge writes:

“During a class on Pentecostal doctrine at WABC, where he was an invited guest speaker, Goss was asked specifically about his view of the new birth. He was not hesitant in affirming that all ‘Trinitarian brothers were in the body of Christ and they would all go up together.’ Goss explained his view by saying that both oneness and Trinitarian believers had been baptized into one body. He openly asserted that baptism was ‘because of’ the remission of sins and therefore a post salvation matter. Observers reported that this ‘created quite a stir.’ After a separate teaching session, students engaged Goss in a highly animated debate. This went on throughout the day, shifting locations and finally wound up in a dormitory room. At length, in the wee hours of the morning, Howard A. Goss emerged from the room followed by one of the students who ran from the dormitory shouting, ‘I have seen the light,’ indicating his acceptance of the Goss idea of salvation. Shortly after such conversions, the Goss visits to Stockton promptly ceased. Under acute pressure from those holding contrary theological views to Goss, Clyde Heaney later felt compelled to make public statements in an effort to ‘correct’ the impressions left by Goss. Other teachers at Stockton with similar ideas as Goss, such as Frank J. Van Buskirk, agreed with Haney that they would not, henceforth, teach certain things in WABC classrooms.” (From “Christianity Without the Cross,” page 176).

The rather plain fact that a man of Christian tolerance and unity such as Howard A. Goss, was ultimately driven from BOTH organizations that he had worked so hard to found is a sad testimony to the depths of rancor within Pentecostalism, the Oneness variety in particular. Johnston’s work and its selective memory might be seen as a sort of band-aid to cover these wounds. Interested readers will want more if healing is to be found.

The Greatest Show On Earth by Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show On Earth

This is one of those books where you get the impression the author was sort of nagged or pressured into producing the work. Dawkins’ other works on biological evolution are less formulaic and you cover vast amounts of ground with a kind and gentle guide. After years of confronting and being confronted by the “Scientific Creation” crowd, it’s amazing that our favorite atheist doesn’t come out swinging when doing a book specifically intended to “prove evolution.”

Instead of the anticipated acerbic rejoinders, we are cordially welcomed as if by an old friend, and invited to sit and think things through. For me, one of the greatest gems came right at the start. Quoting Ernst Mayr, Dawkins demonstrates the influence of the old Platonic Ideals and how their logical contingencies forced human thinking into accepting the idea of fixed species. Removing this obstacle to our thinking, he then goes on to inspire us further with the wonders of creation while documenting with overwhelming evidence the true record of natural history on our planet. I have stepped around this issue of the Platonic Ideals myself without really making the connections in biology that Dawkins does.

My own experience tells me that very few Fundamentalist Creationists would be inclined to read this wonderful book. If, however, you are open to wonder and enjoy the amazing panorama that surrounds us all, this book is for you. Dawkins avoids being “preachy” in the manner that he comes across at times in the “God Delusion.” In “The Greatest Show on Earth” we find the Oxford biologist in his field of expertise and having a great time.

The book is filled with many illustrations and drawings which are helpful in explaining the sometimes complex workings of biology. We also are treated to a large number of full color photographic plates.

The concluding two chapters of the book present us with the theological puzzles. What does the immense suffering observed in the geologic record tell us about the “justice of God?” (Theodicy). And, given both Darwin’s and Dawkins’ presentation that it was specifically “through death and famine… the production of the higher animals directly follows,” why would God use such a means to create man in His own image? I don’t pretend to have the complete answers for such a riddle, but isn’t this pretty much what we see in the Bible’s record as well? Death is in the world. The world is ruled and shaped by death. However, because One overcame death, we have the hope that this current state of affairs will be overturned and that death itself will be destroyed.

I can’t pretend that Dawkins is motivated by this same hope as I am. He explicitly denies it elsewhere. I do, however, appreciate the fact that he is in a discussion about things that are real and things that really did happen (Earth’s Natural History). There is a great contradistinction here between our Oxford atheist and the “Young Earth Creationist” crowd. The YEC’s want me to find my hope in a delusion. Dawkins gives me the truth and then says, in effect, “Good luck with that.”

Thank you, Professor. I appreciate the candor. I am sobered by the reality. And, I do still find more than enough room for that hope.

 

 

Page 1 of 3123»